Bermuda wants to become the world’s first “fully on-chain national economy.”
The announcement, delivered jointly by the island’s government, Circle, and Coinbase on Jan. 19, frames the initiative as the deployment of digital asset infrastructure across government agencies, local banks, insurers, small businesses, and consumers, with USDC positioned as the primary payment rail.
The pitch: fast, low-cost, dollar-denominated settlement replacing expensive legacy systems.
However, strip away the marketing gloss, and what’s actually on the table is something narrower and more instructive: a pilot-driven modernization of payment rails in a small, high-cost economy where traditional card networks extract hefty fees and where experimentation carries limited systemic risk.
Bermuda isn’t mandating that every resident transact on a blockchain, but it is testing whether stablecoins can function as an everyday settlement infrastructure without forcing consumers to change how they pay.
That distinction matters because the real story here isn’t Bermuda’s crypto ambitions. It’s the quiet, grinding work of making dollars-on-chain a practical financial layer, and the gap between what that requires and what most “on-chain economy” headlines imply.
What “fully on-chain” actually describes
The official releases outline three concrete near-term actions: government agencies piloting stablecoin-based payments, financial institutions integrating tokenization tools, and residents participating in digital literacy programs.
The government characterizes this as a continuation of a multi-year arc that began with the Digital Asset Business Act in 2018, included a USDC airdrop at the Bermuda Digital Finance Forum in 2025, and will scale further at the 2026 forum in May.
But “fully on-chain” functions as a spectrum, not a binary.
At the low end, it’s marketing with an announcement with minimal change to actual payment flows. At the high end, it’s an integrated national infrastructure where banks, insurers, and government agencies have built stablecoin settlement into core systems, consumer wallets arecommon, and measurable cost and time savings appear in the data.
Bermuda’s current position sits somewhere between allowing on-chain payments and making them a default settlement rail for key flows.
The language supports Level 1 to early Level 2: pilots exist, “multiple live examples” are claimed, but no adoption statistics, timelines, or mandates have been disclosed.
The government hasn’t published merchant counts, transaction volumes, cost comparisons, or wallet penetration rates, and these metrics distinguish experimentation from transformation.
| Level | Operational meaning | What you’d need to see | What Bermuda has actually disclosed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | “On-chain economy” is primarily a branding line, with little to no change in real payment flows. | No meaningful new payment options in production; no measurable change in costs, settlement times, or adoption; no public roadmap beyond general ambition. | High-level ambition language + partnership framing; no KPIs, timelines, or adoption figures published. (Easy to over-interpret without data.) |
| 1 | On-chain payments are permitted and usable in pockets: early merchant acceptance and limited government/payment experiments. | Named payment categories in scope (e.g., specific fees/taxes); baseline counts (# merchants, # wallets); early volumes (monthly txn count/$$); basic user journeys (cash-in/out availability). | Releases describe pilots and claim “multiple live examples,” with USDC positioned centrally, plus education/onboarding plans — but provide no merchant counts, wallet penetration, volumes, or cost comps. |
| 2 | Stablecoins become a default (or common) settlement option for key flows, while legacy rails still exist. | Penetration rates by sector (% of merchant sales in stablecoins); cost delta vs cards/wires; settlement speed metrics; reliable on/off-ramps; named bank/insurer integrations with go-live dates; compliance framework in production. | Language supports “allowing on-chain payments” moving toward “default rails” in aspiration, but there’s no disclosed timetable, no named integrating institutions, and no measured adoption/cost outcomes yet. |
| 3 | On-chain is integrated into the national financial stack: government + financial institutions + broad consumer usage with measurable macro impact. | Government collections + disbursements materially on-chain (taxes/fees + benefits/payroll/rebates); broad merchant coverage; high wallet penetration; audited cost/time savings; resiliency/uptime stats; clear governance and success metrics. | Not established by the announcement: no mandate, no claim that “all GDP” settles on-chain, no replacement of fiat system, and no published success metrics showing system-level transformation. |
The island as a laboratory
Bermuda’s small scale makes it an ideal testing ground. With a population of roughly 64,600 and a GDP of $9.23 billion, the economy is highly open and services-oriented.
Consumer spending hit $841 million in the second quarter of 2025, providing a useful anchor for estimating potential savings.
Traditional card networks charge merchants a blended fee of 2.5% to 3.5%. Stablecoin rails, depending on the on-ramp and compliance infrastructure, can reduce that to 0.5% 1.5%.
If 10% of Bermuda’s consumer spending shifted to stablecoins, annual merchant savings could range from $3.4 million to $10.1 million. At 30% penetration, that climbs to $10.1 million to $30.3 million.
Those numbers are illustrative models that assume functional cash-in/cash-out infrastructure, merchant tooling, and regulatory clarity.
But they show why even modest adoption could be meaningful for a small economy.
The island has been experimenting with digital payments for years. In 2019, Circle announced Bermuda would accept USDC for tax payments. In 2020, the government partnered with Stablehouse on a “digital stimulus token” pilot for in-person merchant transactions.
The current initiative builds on that history, but it’s still unclear which government payment categories, such as taxes, licenses, customs, benefits, or payroll, will be included in the pilots, or when.
The Visa proof point
The cleaner signal that stablecoins are becoming a practical settlement infrastructure doesn’t come from Bermuda. It comes from Visa.
On Dec. 16, Visa announced USDC settlement for US issuer and acquirer partners, with initial banks including Cross River and Lead Bank.
Settlement runs over Solana, and broader US availability is planned through 2026. By late November, Visa’s stablecoin settlement program had reached $3.5 billion in annualized volume.
By mid-January 2026, that figure had grown to $4.5 billion.
Visa’s pitch mirrors Bermuda’s: modernize the rails without changing the consumer experience. Cardholders swipe the same way, and merchants receive dollars the same way.
The difference is in backend settlement speed and cost. Yet, Visa’s own crypto head acknowledged in January that stablecoins still lack “merchant acceptance at scale” for direct spending.
The $4.5 billion annualized run rate is real traction, but it’s a rounding error next to Visa’s $14.2 trillion in total payment volume.
That contrast of growing institutional adoption alongside limited consumer-facing utility defines stablecoins as payment infrastructure. They’re effective as settlement rails inside existing networks. They’re not yet replacing cards at checkout.
What the numbers hide
Stablecoin transaction volume headlines are misled by design.
Bloomberg reported $33 trillion in total stablecoin transaction value for 2025, a 72% year-over-year increase.
Meanwhile, Visa’s on-chain analytics paint a different picture: $47 trillion in gross stablecoin volume, but only $10.4 trillion when adjusted for high-frequency trading, arbitrage, and non-payment activity.
That gap matters. It’s the difference between treating stablecoins as speculative instruments cycling through wash trades and treating them as genuine payment infrastructure.
Bermuda’s bet assumes the latter use case will dominate, but the data shows the former still drives most volume.
Circulating stablecoin supply now exceeds $310 billion, with USDT accounting for roughly $187 billion. That’s real liquidity, but it doesn’t automatically translate into grocery store checkouts or payroll disbursements.
The connectors, such as on-ramps, off-ramps, merchant tooling, and compliance frameworks, remain the hard part.
What Bermuda’s announcement doesn’t establish
The official releases don’t mandate that residents or merchants use stablecoins. They don’t claim that all GDP will settle on public blockchains. They don’t replace Bermuda’s fiat system with a sovereign token.
More importantly, they don’t solve the banking problem: stablecoins still need the same connectors that enable traditional payments.
Bermuda’s Digital Asset Business Act, passed in 2018, established a licensing regime for private-sector digital asset businesses and explicitly states it “shall not apply to any entity owned by the Bermuda Government.”
That means the government’s move on-chain doesn’t automatically subject it to the same regulatory framework as Circle or Coinbase.
The announcement also leaves critical questions unanswered. Which agencies will pilot stablecoin payments, and for which services? Which banks and insurers have integrated tokenization tools? What percentage of merchants accept USDC today, and what’s the average transaction size?
Officials claim “multiple live examples” but provide no metrics. That’s the gap between rhetoric and reality.
The real stakes
The question isn’t whether Bermuda will wake up tomorrow with every transaction on a blockchain. It won’t.
The question is whether a small, high-cost economy can build enough on-chain infrastructure to make stablecoins a default option for a meaningful share of economic activity.
If it works, Bermuda becomes a reference case for other jurisdictions evaluating stablecoin adoption. If it doesn’t, the island joins the long list of crypto-friendly jurisdictions that announced ambitious plans but struggled with execution.
The outcome depends less on blockchain technology than on operational discipline: onboarding merchants, training consumers, integrating compliance, and ensuring the cost savings are real and measurable.
